Annals of SBV

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2021 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Role of Fetal Abdominal Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness in Predicting Large for Gestational Age in Gestational Diabetes

Mohan Smitha, P Pallavee

Keywords : Birth weight, Fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness, Gestational diabetes mellitus, Large for gestational age, Ultrasound

Citation Information : Smitha M, Pallavee P. Role of Fetal Abdominal Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness in Predicting Large for Gestational Age in Gestational Diabetes. 2021; 10 (1):2-4.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10085-8134

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 07-08-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most prevalent metabolic complications in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, one of which is large for gestational age (LGA) baby. Large for gestational age fetuses have increased subcutaneous fat deposition in the abdomen. This can be measured by fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness (FASTT) using ultrasound. This review has highlighted the usefulness of FASTT as a predictor of LGA neonate in GDM. Objectives: The present review is aimed to determine the usefulness of FASTT measurement as a predictor of large for gestational age neonate in gestational diabetes mellitus. Materials and methods: An electronic search strategy was used to select the studies from different databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, SciELO, Research Gate. A combination of keywords like FASTT, GDM, birth weight (BW), and ultrasound was used to select the studies. Inclusion criteria were English language, duration of search 15 years, cohort, and observational studies only. However, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded from the review. The total number of articles reviewed was 48 out of which only 12 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The selected articles were further assessed for the quality of the research and included in the review. Conclusion: Fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness had a positive correlation with BW and can discriminate between small for gestational age (SGA), appropriate for gestational age (AGA), and LGA neonates. Fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness is a useful tool to predict LGA neonates in GDM.


PDF Share
  1. Kc K, Shakya S, Zhang H. Gestational diabetes mellitus and macrosomia: a literature review. Ann Nutr Metab 2015;66(2):14–20. DOI: 10.1159/000371628.
  2. Bamberg C, Hinkson L, Henrich W. Prenatal detection and consequences of fetal macrosomia. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33(3):143–148. DOI: 10.1159/000341813.
  3. Cetin I, Boito S, Radaelli T. Evaluation of fetal growth and fetal well-being. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2008;29(2):136–146. DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2008.01.002.
  4. Brand JS, West J, Tuffnell D, Bird PK, Wright J, Tilling K, et al. Gestational diabetes and ultrasound-assessed fetal growth in South Asian and White European women: findings from a prospective pregnancy cohort. BMC Med 2018;16(1):203. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1191-7.
  5. Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Allen SR, McBean JH, McAuliffe TL. Evaluation of fetal growth by estimation of neonatal body composition. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79(1):46–50.
  6. Bhat RG, Nathan A, Amar R, Vasudeva A, Adiga P, Bhat PV, et al. Correlation of fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness by ultrasound to predict birth weight. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(4):OC09–OC11. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6498.4214.
  7. Singh A, Chander R, Singh S, Kumari S. Estimation of fetal weight and its correlation with actual birth weight by sonographic measurement of fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness (FASTT). J Evolut Med Dent Sci 2014;3(37):9610–9620. DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2014/3244.
  8. Odthon T, Pitukkijronnakorn S, Chittacharoen A. Sonographic measurement fetal abdominal circumference and fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness for predicting fetal macrosomia. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;23(4):216–222.
  9. Larciprete G, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Novelli GP, Parretti E, Altomare F, et al. Fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCTT) in healthy and gestational diabetic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22(6):591–597. DOI: 10.1002/uog.926.
  10. Rigano S, Ferrazzi E, Radaelli T, Cetin ET, Pardi G. Sonographic measurements of subcutaneous fetal fat in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes and in normal pregnancies. Croat Med J 2000;41(3):240–244.
  11. Aksoy H, Aksoy Ü, Yücel B, Özyurt SS, Aydın T, Babayiğit MA. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness may be an early ultrasonographic sign of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29(12):2028–2032. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015. 1072164.
  12. Higgins MF, Russell NM, Mulcahy CH, Coffey M, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness in diabetic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;140(1):43–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.02.021.
  13. Kuttan K, George ANR, Ramachandran L. Correlational study of birth weight to sonographic measurement of umbilical cord thickness, fetal abdominal and shoulder pad thickness in overt and gestational diabetes mellitus. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res 2019;6(1):20–23. DOI: 10.18231/2394-2754.2019.0005.
  14. Rauf KER, Adarsh KM, Acharya D, Ahmed K. Measurement of fetal abdominal and subscapular subcutaneous soft tissue thickness to predict macrosomia in pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes. IOSR-JDMS 2020;19(2):32–40.
  15. Lertvutivivat S, Sunsaneevithayakul P, Ruangvutilert P, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2020;59(5):669–674. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.008.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.