Annals of SBV

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Influence of Implant Surface Characteristics on Microbiota: A Review

Gowtham Krishna, Vineela K Reddy, Pratebha Balu

Keywords : Implant, Microbiota, Peri-implantitis, Surface characteristics

Citation Information : Krishna G, Reddy VK, Balu P. Influence of Implant Surface Characteristics on Microbiota: A Review. 2022; 11 (1):3-5.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10085-9113

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-10-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Dental implants have a broad array of applications, from single tooth replacement to complete oral rehabilitation with a prosthesis. Microorganisms colonize the implant's surface when it is exposed to the oral cavity. A successful implant treatment, however, is dependent on the absence of inflammation in the peri-implant tissues. The relationship of implant surface characteristics to the microbiota plays a major role in the success of an implant. The initial adherence of bacteria to intraoral surfaces is determined by the surface's physiochemical properties, such as the surface free energy (SFE) of the bacteria, the solid phase, and the surrounding liquid, as well as the surface integrity and composition of the solid medium. The surface characteristics at the micro or nanometer level, hydrophilicity, and biochemical bonding are responsible for implant success. The surface can be modified by either addition or subtraction procedures like acid etching, sandblasting, plasma spraying, hydroxyapatite coating, etc. By modifying the characteristics of the surface, biocompatibility can be improved, faster osseointegration can be provoked. The roughed surface has good osseointegration due to clot stability whereas, on the contrary, they are more prone to biofilm formation. Biofilm has been associated with almost all periodontal diseases, therefore knowledge of microbes around the implant is necessary for diagnosis and treatment. This review focuses on the influence of implant surface characteristics such as surface roughness, surface free energy, and surface composition on oral microbiota.

PDF Share
  1. Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza's clinical periodontology. 12th ed. Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. p. 767–769.
  2. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2006;23(7):844–854. DOI: 10.1016/
  3. Koshy E, Philip SR. Dental implant surfaces: an overview. Int J Clin Implant Dent 2015;1(1):14–22. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10004-1028.
  4. Yeo IS, Kim HY, Lim KS, Han JS. Implant surface factors and bacterial adhesion: a review of the literature. Int J Artifi Organs 2012;35(10): 762–772. DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000154.
  5. Renvert S, Polyzois I, Claffey N. How do implant surface characteristics influence peri-implant disease? J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:214–222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01661.x.
  6. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(S2):68–81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x.
  7. Heuer W, Elter C, Demling A, Neumann A, Suerbaum S, Hannig M, et al. Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(5):377–382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01725.x.
  8. Elter C, Heuer W, Demling A, Hannig M, Heidenblut T, Bach FW, et al. Supra-and subgingival biofilm formation on implant abutments with different surface characteristics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23(2):327. PMID: 18548931.
  9. Bürgers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Hahnel S. Candida albicans adhesion tocomposite resinmaterials. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:293–299. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-008-0226-4.
  10. Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hämmerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(4):616. PMID: 19885401.
  11. Parlar A, Bosshardt DD, Çetiner D, Schafroth D, Unsal B, Haytaç C, et al. Effects of decontamination and implant surface characteristics on re-osseointegration following treatment of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(4):391–399. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01655.x.
  12. Albouy JP, Abrahamsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T. Spontaneous progression of ligatured induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface characteristics. An experimental study in dogs II: histological observations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(4):366–371. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01645.x.
  13. Bürgers R, Hahnel S, Reichert TE, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gerlach T, et al. Adhesion of Candida albicans to various dental implant surfaces and the influence of salivary pellicle proteins. Acta Biomater 2010;6(6):2307–2313. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.003.
  14. Fröjd V, Linderbäck P, Wennerberg A, de Paz LC, Svensäter G, Davies JR. Effect of nanoporous TiO2 coating and anodized Ca2+ modification of titanium surfaces on early microbial biofilm formation. BMC Oral Health 2011;11(1):8. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-11-8.
  15. Albouy JP, Abrahamsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T. Implant surface characteristics influence the outcome of treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38(1): 58–64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01631.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.